Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III Randomised Clinical Trial

  • J. L. Blackshear
    ,
  • V. S. Baker
    ,
  • F. Rubino
    ,
  • R. Safford
    ,
  • G. Lane
    ,
  • T. Flipse
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
    ,
  • University of Missouri
    ,
  • ,
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    ,
  • Park Nicollet Health Services
    ,
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background Adjusted-dose warfarin is highly efficacious for prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this treatment carries a risk of bleeding and the need for frequent medical monitoring. We sought an alternative that would be safer and easier to administer to patients with AF who are at high-risk of thromboembolism. Methods 1044 patients with AF and with at least one thromboembolic risk factor (congestive heart failure or left ventricular fractional shortening ≤ 25%, previous thromboembolism, systolic blood pressure of more than 160 mm Hg at study enrolment, or being a woman aged over 75 years) were randomly assigned either a combination of low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin (international normalised ratio [INR] 1.2-1.5 for initial dose adjustment) and aspirin (325 mg/day) or adjusted-dose warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0). Drugs were given open-labelled. Findings The mean INR during follow-up of patients taking combination therapy (n = 521) was 1.3, compared with 2.4 for those taking adjusted-dose warfarin (n = 523). During follow up, 54% of INRs in patients taking combination therapy were 1.2-1.5 and 34% were less than 1.2. The trial was stopped after a mean follow-up of 1.1 years when the rate of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism (primary events) in patients given combination therapy (7.9% per year) was significantly higher than in those given adjusted-dose warfarin (1.9% per year) at an interim analysis (p < 0.0001), an absolute reduction of 6.0% per year (95% CI 3.4, 8.6) by adjusted-dose warfarin. The annual rates of disabling stroke (5.6% vs 1.7%, p = 0.0007) and of primary event or vascular death (11.8% vs 6.4%, p = 0.002), were also higher with combination therapy. The rates of major bleeding were similar in both treatment groups. Interpretation Low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin in this regimen is insufficient for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF at high-risk for thromboembolism; adjusted-dose warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) importantly reduces stroke for high-risk patients.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 633-638 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

The Lancet (Volume 348, Issue 9028)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/07/1996

Publication status

Published - 09/07/1996

ISSN

0140-6736

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 9544248668
  • PubMed: 8782752

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
1069
SciVal
FWCI
79.12
SciVal
Author count
159
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.01
Fractional count
161
Fractional count
0.99
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
1146
Captures
215

Funding Details

This study was supported by grant (R01 NS 24224) from the Division of Stroke and Trauma, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
FundersFunding number
Division of Stroke and Trauma
-
NINDS
R01NS024224