Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Adjusting for Confounders in Cross-correlation Analysis: an Application to Resting State Networks

  • Deepak Nag Ayyala(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Anindya Roy
    ,
  • Junyong Park
    ,
  • Rao P. Gullapalli
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Jackson Laboratory
    ,
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County
    ,
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Resting State Network (RSN) analysis investigates spontaneous brain activity when the brain is not subjected to any external stimuli. The interest in RSN analysis lies primarily in understanding the interaction between different brain regions that occur while the brain is “at rest”, i.e., not prompted by external tasks. The network of brain regions involved and their activity during the resting state has been found to be consistent across broad population and thus could be helpful in identifying aberrations in individual brains or effects of particular adverse events. Testing for functional consistency in RSN requires analysis of time series patterns for multiple time series signal emanating from the different brain regions. An approach for studying reproducibility is testing for stability in the cross-correlations function of the multiple time series signal. However, often the testing procedures do not adequately account for the temporal dependence in the signal and may lead to erroneous conclusion, particularly in the presence of confounder such as scan-to-scan and visit-to-visit variation. In this article, we develop a general paradigm for testing for such confounder in the cross-correlation analysis. Merit of the proposal is demonstrated via simulation and the proposed test is shown to have reasonable type I error and power under a variety of dependence structures for the multivariate signals. The methodology is then applied to the motivating data set involving a motor network and it is shown that unless properly controlled, confounders can significantly affect the test of reproducibility of the network. Once the analysis is adjusted for confounders, the findings reaffirm the conventional wisdom about reproducibility of RSN.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 123-150 (28 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Sankhya B (Volume 80, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/01/2018

Publication status

Published - 05/01/2018

ISSN

0976-8386

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85034025767
  • Scopus: 85050464664

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
27
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

Funding Details

Acknowledgements. The study was partly supported by Department of Defense grant W81XWH-08-1-0725. The authors would like to thank Neha Shah, Tejaswini Kavallappa and Chandler Sour for their help in subject recruitment and data acquisition.