Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Amphibian and reptile communities associated with beaver (castor canadensis) ponds and unimpounded streams in the piedmont of south carolina

  • Kevin R. Russell
    ,
  • Christopher E. Moorman
    ,
  • J. Kenneth Edwards
    ,
  • Brian S. Metts
    ,
  • David C. Guynn
  • Clemson University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

We used drift fence arrays with pitfall traps to compare amphibian and reptile assemblages at the peripheries of beaver (Castor canadensis) ponds of two age-classes (“new”: ≤ 5 yr old, and “old”: ≥ 10 yr old) and unimpounded streams in the Piedmont of South Carolina. The richness and total abundance of amphibians were not significantly different among new beaver ponds, old beaver ponds, and unimpounded streams, although several species of anurans were captured predominantly or exclusively at beaver ponds. Amphibian community overlap and diversity also were similar among the three habitats. In contrast, the richness and total abundance of reptiles were significantly higher at old beaver ponds when compared to new beaver ponds and unimpounded streams. The degree of reptile community overlap also was relatively low, with significant differences in diversity among all three habitats. Differences in amphibian and reptile community attributes between beaver ponds and unimpounded streams likely were related to the lentic or lotic habitat requirements of individual species and the effects of beaver impoundments on surrounding upland habitats.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 149-158 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Freshwater Ecology (Volume 14, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/1999

Publication status

Published - 06/1999

ISSN

0270-5060

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0032987050

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
28
SciVal
FWCI
0.46
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
76

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
42
Mentions
1
Captures
51

Funding Details

Funding for this project was provided by the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Rtsearch Program and the Clemson University Department of Forest Resources. We thank B. Carmichael, R. Davis, W. Gatlin, and R. Myers for assistance with the field work. We also thank H. G. Hanlin, J. D. Lanham, J. A. Kawatski, and two anonymous reviewers for critical comments that significantly improved the manuscript.
FundersFunding numbers
Clemson University Department of Forest Resources
-
McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Rtsearch Program
-