Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

An additional analysis of estimation techniques for the degree of financial leverage

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

This study compares three different empirical proxies for the financial leverage component of a systematic risk-composition model employed in prior financial research. We consider one static accounting measure and two elasticity-based measures. We find that the traditional static accounting measure of financial leverage provides statistically different estimates of financial leverage when compared to estimates from elasticity-based measures of the degree of financial leverage. The findings are important because the elasticity-based models for the degree of financial leverage have clear theoretical links to market-based models of systematic risk, while the static accounting measure of financial leverage does not. Practitioners and researchers should carefully consider why they are estimating financial leverage and choose the appropriate method for doing so given the goals and potential consequences for biased estimation.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 220-231 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Review of Financial Economics (Volume 36, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 09/02/2016
  • Published - 09/02/2016

Publication status

Published - 09/02/2016

ISSN

1058-3300

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85082353209

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.15
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
1
SciVal
Paper percentile
40

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
35
Citation count
3