Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Methods for the Estimation of the Degree of Operating Leverage

  • Michael T. Dugan(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Keith A. Shriver
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Alabama
    ,
  • Arizona State University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Much diversity exists in the approaches used to estimate the degree of operating leverage in empirical financial research. This study analyzes and compares two techniques for the estimation of the degree of operating leverage coefficients for a sample of 245 firms in seven different industries over two alternative estimation periods. The results indicate that the O'Brien and Vanderheiden estimation technique differs significantly from the Mandelker and Rhee estimation technique. Furthermore, the O'Brien and Vanderheiden estimates appear to be more consistent with the classical ex ante model of degree of operating leverage coefficients. These results may facilitate future research on the estimation of the degree of operating leverage and on the relationship between operating leverage and systematic risk.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 309-321 (13 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Financial Review (Volume 27, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/1992

Publication status

Published - 05/1992

ISSN

0732-8516

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84987515892

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
15
Captures
13