Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Application of the mangled extremity severity score in a combat setting

  • Randy Kjorstad(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Benjamin W. Starnes
    ,
  • Edward Arlington
    ,
  • ,
  • Charles A. Andersen
    ,
  • Robert M. Rush
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Madigan Army Medical Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) in a combat setting. Methods: Data on extremity injuries were collected from a forward surgical team. MESS and Revised Trauma Score values were retrospectively calculated for each patient. Student's t test was used to compare amputated and salvaged limbs. Results: A total of 60 extremities was identified in 49 patients. There were 10 major vascular repairs (20%). MESS values differed significantly for the eight amputations performed (mean MESS, 7.87 ± 1.91) and 50 salvaged extremities (mean MESS, 2.44 ± 0.438; p = 0.001). Conclusions: A MESS of >7 correlated with amputation, thus validating the MESS in a combat setting. A young average patient age and high-energy injury mechanism on the battlefield leave ischemic time and shock as the most important factors in dictating whether a MESS is >7 or <7.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 777-781 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Military medicine (Volume 172, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2007

Publication status

Published - 07/2007

ISSN

0026-4075

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 34447532067
  • PubMed: 17691695

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.60
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
citations
47
SciVal
Paper percentile
87
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
58
Citation count
62