Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?

  • John Rodway Mackert
    ,
  • Michael J. Wahl
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 601-610 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the California Dental Association (Volume 32, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2004

Publication status

Published - 07/2004

ISSN

1043-2256

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 7944228333
  • PubMed: 15468542

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
18
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.31
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
68

PlumX

Citation count
23
Mentions
1
Social media
1