Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Assessing Technical Assistance Needs among Recovery Residence Operators in the United States

  • Jennifer Miles(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Terry Bunn
    ,
  • Amber Kizewski
    ,
  • Tyler Jennings
    ,
  • ,
  • Dave Johnson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
    ,
  • University of Kentucky
    ,
  • The Fletcher Group
    ,
  • National Alliance for Recovery Residences
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Abstract

Recovery support services such as recovery housing assist individuals with increasing their access to social support, employment services, and systems of care. Lack of evidence-based practices and calls for increased oversight of these settings suggests a growing need for technical assistance and training for recovery residence owners and staff, yet little is known about their areas of greatest need for technical assistance. We developed and administered a survey to assess the technical assistance needs of recovery housing operators in the United States using a convenience sample of individuals who own or operate a recovery residence (N = 376). A total of 77 owners/operators completed the survey (20% response rate), representing urban, suburban, and rural communities. Differences were observed between number of owned residences: owners/operators of a single residence were interested in technical assistance on house-specific policies and linkage to established systems of care, whereas owners/operators of multiple residences were interested in technical assistance on building financial sustainability and incorporation of best practices into their recovery residences. As an increasing number of states move to implement voluntary certification or licensing for recovery residences, targeted training and technical assistance to owners/operators will facilitate the successful adoption of recovery residence best practices and quality standards.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 188-195 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (Volume 54, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2022

Publication status

Published - 2022

ISSN

0279-1072

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85110824965
  • PubMed: 34269163

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
18
Citation count
6

Funding Details

Work on this manuscript was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) 6 UD9RH336310105. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of HRSA. The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the findings, or in the writing of the manuscript. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number TL1TR003019. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Sarah Eustice, Adam Trosper, Michelle Kilgore, and Jay Bell for their contributions to survey development, recruitment, and study design.
FundersFunding numbers
NIH
-
HRSA
6 UD9RH336310105
NCATS
TL1TR003019