Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Association Between Surgeon and Anesthesiologist Sex Discordance and Postoperative Outcomes: A Population-based Cohort Study

  • Christopher J.D. Wallis(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Angela Jerath
    ,
  • Kirusanthy Kaneshwaran
    ,
  • Julie Hallet
    ,
  • Natalie Coburn
    ,
  • Frances C. Wright
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Toronto
    ,
  • Vanderbilt University
    ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • Houston Methodist
    ,
  • George Washington University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was to examine the effect of surgeon-anesthesiologist sex discordance on postoperative outcomes.Summary Background Data:Optimal surgical outcomes depend on teamwork, with surgeons and anesthesiologists forming two key components. There are sex and sex-based differences in interpersonal communication and medical practice which may contribute to patients' perioperative outcomes.Methods:We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study among adult patients undergoing 1 of 25 common elective or emergent surgical procedures from 2007 to 2019 in Ontario, Canada. We assessed the association between differences in sex between surgeon and anesthesiologists (sex discordance) on the primary endpoint of adverse postoperative outcome, defined as death, readmission, or complication within 30-days following surgery using generalized estimating equations.Results:Among 1,165,711 patients treated by 3006 surgeons and 1477 anesthesiologists, 791,819 patients were treated by sex concordant teams (male surgeon/male anesthesiologist: 747,327 and female surgeon/female anesthesiologist: 44,492), whereas 373,892 were sex discordant (male surgeon/female anesthesiologist: 267,330 and female surgeon/male anesthesiologist: 106,562). Overall, 12.3% of patients experienced >1 adverse postoperative outcomes of whom 1.3% died. Sex discordance between surgeon and anesthesiologist was not associated with a significant increased likelihood of composite adverse postoperative outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.03).Conclusions:We did not demonstrate an association between intraoperative surgeon and anesthesiologist sex discordance on adverse postoperative outcomes in a large patient cohort. Patients, clinicians, and administrators may be reassured that physician sex discordance in operating room teams is unlikely to clinically meaningfully affect patient outcomes after surgery.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 81-87 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Annals of surgery (Volume 276, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/01/2022

Publication status

Published - 07/01/2022

ISSN

0003-4932

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85133228997
  • PubMed: 35703460

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.06
Fractional count
17
Fractional count
0.94
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
16
Usage
26
Citation count
18

Funding Details

Disclaimer: This study made use of de-identified data from the iCES Data Repository, which is managed by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences with support from its funders and partners: Canada's Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), the Ontario SPOR Support Unit, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Government of Ontario. The opinions, results and conclusions reported are those of the authors. No endorsement by ICES or any of its funders or partners is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by CiHi. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of CIHI.
FundersFunding numbers
Government of Ontario
-
IRSC
-