Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Balance and mobility training with or without concurrent cognitive training improves the timed up and go (TUG), TUG cognitive, and TUG manual in healthy older adults: an exploratory study

*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Ottawa
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background and aims: The purpose was to explore the impact of balance and mobility training (BMT), balance and mobility plus cognitive training (BMT + C) and no training on the timed up and go (TUG), TUG cognitive (TUGcog), and TUG manual (TUGman) in older adults. A preliminary experiment examined the stability of these TUG measures over a 5-week period in older adults. Methods: Fifteen participants in the BMT group (70.2 ± 3.2 years) and 14 participants in the BMT + C group (68.7 ± 5.5 years) trained one-on-one, 3×/week for 12 weeks on a balance obstacle course. The BMT group and the BMT + C group completed two or three tasks simultaneously, respectively. Fifteen participants in the control group received no training (66.7 ± 4.2 years). The TUG, TUGcog, and TUGman were measured in seconds at baseline, after the 12-week training, and after the 12-week follow-up. During the preliminary experiment, ten participants (67.0 ± 6.9 years) completed the three TUG measures 1/week for 5 weeks. Results: Both the BMT and BMT + C groups, but not the control group, exhibited significantly faster TUG, TUGcog, and TUGman after the intervention and maintained these improvements at the 12-week follow-up. No differences between the BMT and BMT + C groups emerged. The preliminary experiment showed that the three TUG measures were stable across five testing sessions. Discussion and conclusion: Both training groups improved functional mobility after the interventions and sustained these improvements over 12 weeks. This is likely not a function of repeating the TUG, TUGcog, and TUGman tests since no repeated exposure effect was shown.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 711-720 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (Volume 29, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/01/2017

Publication status

Published - 08/01/2017

ISSN

1594-0667

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84982290293
  • PubMed: 27538832

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
24
Captures
129

Funding Details

A special thank you to Dominique Mercier and Eliane Dionne who aided with the one-on-one balance training. This project was financed by an internal grant from the University of Ottawa (Grant Number 119656).