Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Balance and mobility training with or without simultaneous cognitive training reduces attention demand but does not improve obstacle clearance in older adults

*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Ottawa
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether balance and mobility training (BMT) or balance and mobility plus cognitive training (BMT + C) would improve obstacle clearance and reaction time (RT); whether further improvements would be exposed in the BMT + C group relative to the BMT group; and whether possible improvements would be sustained at the follow-up. Healthy older adults were allocated to the BMT (n = 15; age: 70.2 ± 3.2), BMT +C (n = 14; age: 68.7 ± 5.5), or control group (n = 13; age: 66.7 ± 4.2). The BMT and BMT + C groups trained one-on-one, three times per week for 12 weeks on a balance obstacle course. The BMT + C group also completed cognitive training. Participants walked onto and over six obstacles of varying heights while completing no RT, simple RT, and choice RT tasks at baseline, posttraining, and at the 12-week follow-up. Both the BMT and BMT + C groups improved RT and maintained these improvements at the follow-up. No meaningful improvements in obstacle clearance emerged following training. Thus, dual-task balance training likely reduces attention demand.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 275-294 (20 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Motor Control (Volume 22, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2018

Publication status

Published - 07/2018

ISSN

1087-1640

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85049205377
  • PubMed: 29182460

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
5
Captures
61

Funding Details

This project was financed by an internal grant from the University of Ottawa. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
FunderFunding numbers
U of O
-