Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin

  • M. Yoshiyama
    ,
  • ,
  • J. Doi
    ,
  • Y. Nishitani
    ,
  • T. Yamada
    ,
  • K. Itou
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Okayama University
    ,
  • The University of Hong Kong
    ,
  • Universidade de São Paulo
    ,
  • Institute of Science Tokyo
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Carious dentin is partially demineralized and contains mineral crystals in the tubules. This may permit the deeper etching of intertubular dentin but prevent resin tag formation during bonding. We hypothesize that resin adhesives will produce lower bond strengths to caries-infected and caries-affected dentin compared with normal dentin. We tested this by measuring the microtensile bond strength of a total-etch adhesive and an experimental self-etching adhesive (ABF) to caries-infected, caries-affected, and sound dentin and by correlating those results with ultrastructural observations. The bond strengths of both adhesives to sound dentin were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those to caries-affected dentin, which, in turn were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those to caries-infected dentin. For both adhesives, hybrid layers in caries-affected dentin were thicker but more porous than those in sound dentin. The lower bond strengths may be due to the lower tensile strength of caries-affected dentin. Clinically, this may not be a problem, since such lesions are normally surrounded by normal dentin or enamel.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 556-560 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Dental Research (Volume 81, Issue 8)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/01/2002

Publication status

Published - 08/01/2002

ISSN

0022-0345

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0036704353
  • PubMed: 12147747

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
205
SciVal
FWCI
9.07
SciVal
Author count
9
SciVal
Paper percentile
97
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.22
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.78
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
250
Captures
202