Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin

  • L. Ceballos(corresponding author)
    ,
  • M. Toledano
    ,
  • R. Osorio
    ,
  • ,
  • G. W. Marshall
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Granada
    ,
  • The University of Hong Kong
    ,
  • University of California at San Francisco
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Er-YAG laser irradiation has been claimed to improve the adhesive properties of dentin. We tested the hypothesis that dentin adhesion is affected by Er-YAG laser conditioning. Superficial or deep dentin from human molars was: (a) acid-etched with 35% H3PO4; (b) irradiated with an Er-YAG laser (KaVo) at 2 Hz and 180 mJ, with water-cooling; and (c) laser- and acid-etched. Single Bond (3M ESPE) and Z100 composite (3M ESPE) were bonded to the prepared surfaces. After storage, specimens were tested in shear to failure. Bonded interfaces were demineralized in EDTA and processed for transmission electron microscopy. Two-way ANOVA revealed that conditioning treatment and interaction between treatment and dentin depth significantly influenced shear bond strength results. Acid-etching alone yielded shear bond strength values that were significantly higher than those achieved with laser ablation alone, or in combination with acid-etching. The Er-YAG laser created a laser-modified layer that adversely affects adhesion to dentin, so it does not constitute an alternative bonding strategy to conventional acid etching.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 119-122 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Dental Research (Volume 81, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2002

Publication status

Published - 02/2002

ISSN

0022-0345

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0036479584
  • PubMed: 11827256

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
239
SciVal
FWCI
6.95
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
98
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
97
Citation count
273