Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Burning mouth syndrome. A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.

  • Andres Pinto(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Thomas P. Sollecito
    ,
  • Scott S. DeRossi
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Unknown
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Burning mouth syndrome is a condition characterized by burning sensations of the oral cavity in the absence of physical abnormalities of the mucosa or a detectable underlying medical disorder. It is a multifactorial disorder with unclear etiology, affecting predominatly middle-aged women. Multiple approaches to treatment have been described in the literature, with few controlled clinical trials regarding their efficacy. The objectives of this retrospective study were to: 1. determine the epidemiologic characteristics of BMS patients referred to an oral medicine practice; 2. determine if BMS classification correlates with response to treatment; 3. determine the efficacy of a variety of known therapies for BMS. A database was constructed from the charts of 150 consecutive patients diagnosed with BMS; and these charts were reviewed. Patients were classified according to previously published criteria for BMS. Presumed etiologies were grouped into depression/anxiety-associated; hematinic deficiencies, including iron, folate and vitamin B complex; oral habits: and idiopathic BMS. Treatment approaches were divided into seven categories: soft desensitizing appliance; tricyclic antidepressants (TCA); benzodiazepines (BZD); topical analgesics; hematinic supplements; habit awareness counseling; and multi-modal therapy (combining two or more of the above). Improvement was recorded using a zero to 100% VAS scale and classified as no relief (0%); mild (0-40%); meaningful/moderate (41-80%); and profound relief (81-100%). Burning mouth syndrome without any identifiable cause (idiopathic) was diagnosed in 33 patients (46.6%). Patients were followed up at one month (4 weeks) after the initial visit. Nine patients (12.7%) reported profound relief; 17 patients (23.9%) reported meaningful relief; 39 patients (54.9%) reported mild relief. This retrospective review showed no significant correlation between classification of BMS and response to therapy. The most effective treatment modalities were habit awareness, followed by TCAs.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 18-24 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

The New York state dental journal (Volume 69, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2003

Publication status

Published - 03/2003

ISSN

0028-7571

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0141784024
  • PubMed: 12764983

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
24
SciVal
FWCI
0.85
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
73
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Captures
32
Citation count
28