Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete: Why the routine use of ECG is not necessary

  • William O. Roberts(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Chad A. Asplund
    ,
  • Francis G. O'Connor
    ,
  • Steven D. Stovitz
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
    ,
  • ,
  • Uniformed Services of the Health Sciences
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The addition of an electrocardiogram (ECG) to the current United States athlete preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) as a screening tool has dominated the PPE discussion over the past decade despite the lack of demonstrable outcomes data supporting the routine use of the diagnostic study for reduction of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A good screening test should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health and the population screened must have a high prevalence of the disease to justify the screening intervention. While SCD is publicly remarkable and like any death, tragic, the prevalence of SCD in young athletes is very low and the potential for false positive results is high. While ECG screening appears to have made an impact on SCD in Italian athletes, the strategy has made no impact on Israeli athletes, and the overall impact of ECG screening on American athletes is unclear. Until outcomes studies show substantial SCD reduction benefit, the addition of routine ECG PPE screening in young athletes should not be instituted.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 311-315 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Electrocardiology (Volume 48, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/01/2015

Publication status

Published - 05/01/2015

ISSN

0022-0736

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84928825242
  • PubMed: 25669141

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.61
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
12
SciVal
Paper percentile
72

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
76
Citation count
19
Social media
23