Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Central Anticholinergic Hypersensitivity in Aging

  • P. G. Ray(corresponding author)
    ,
  • K. J. Meador
    ,
  • D. W. Loring
    ,
  • E. W. Zamrini
    ,
  • X. H. Yang
    ,
  • J. J. Buccafusco
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Although neurochemical reductions in cholinergic systems have been found to occur during aging, such changes do not necessarily translate to functional deficits. The cognitive deficits of normal aging have been attributed in part to hypo-cholinergic function, but anticholinergic hypersensitivity in the elderly has not been systematically documented. To test the cholinergic hypothesis of aging, we investigated the effects of scopolamine on memory and attention in healthy young and elderly subjects. Treatments included intramuscular glycopyrrolate (0.0044 mg/kg) and scopolamine (0.002, 0.004, and 0.007 mg/kg) in a randomized double-blind design. The test battery included the Selective Reminding Task (SRT), Digit Span, Paired Associates Learning (PAL), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and the Continuous Performance Task. Elderly controls were more impaired at lower scopolamine doses than were the young on SRT, PAL, and SDMT. These results demonstrate anticholinergic hypersensitivity and are consistent with decremental changes in cholinergic status during normal aging. (J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1992;5:72–77).

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 72-77 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/1992

Publication status

Published - 04/1992

ISSN

0891-9887

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0026602375
  • PubMed: 1317178

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
58
Captures
31