Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Cerebrospinal fluid analysis

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Tripler Regional Med Center
    ,
  • Madigan Army Medical Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Lumbar puncture is frequently performed in primary care. Properly interpreted tests can make cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) a key tool in the diagnosis of a variety of diseases. Proper evaluation of CSF depends on knowing which tests to order, normal ranges for the patient's age, and the test's limitations. Protein level, opening pressure, and CSF-to-serum glucose ratio vary with age. Xanthochromia is most often caused by the presence of blood, but several other conditions should be considered. The presence of blood can be a reliable predictor of suibarachnoid hemorrhage but takes several hours to develop. The three-tube method, commonly used to rule out a central nervous system hemorrhage after a "traumatic tap," is not completely reliable. Red blood cells in CSF caused by a traumatic tap or a subarachnoid hemorrhage artificially increase the white blood cell count and protein level, thereby confounding the diagnosis. Diagnostic uncertainty can be decreased by using accepted corrective formulas. White blood cell differential may be misleading early in the course of meningitis, because more than 10 percent of cases with bacterial infection will have an initial lymphocytic predominance and viral meningitis may initially be dominated by neutrophils. Culture is the gold standard for determining the causative organism in meningitis. However, polymerase chain reaction is much faster and more sensitive in some circumstances. Latex agglutination, with high sensitivity but low specificity, may have a role in managing partially treated meningitis. To prove herpetic, cryptococcal, or tubercular infection, special staining techniques or collection methods may be required. Copyright

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1103-1108 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American family physician (Volume 68, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/15/2003

Publication status

Published - 09/15/2003

ISSN

0002-838X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0141572400
  • PubMed: 14524396

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
149
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.82
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Mentions
6
Citation count
211
Captures
228