Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Changing Nature of High Risk Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

  • Christopher J. Kane(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Joseph C. Presti
    ,
  • Christopher L. Amling
    ,
  • William J. Aronson
    ,
  • ,
  • Stephen J. Freedland
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at San Francisco
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
    ,
  • Stanford University
    ,
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego
    ,
  • VA Medical Center
    ,
  • Duke University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Purpose: We examined the outcomes of radical prostatectomy alone in high risk patients with prostate cancer and evaluated changes in high risk prostate cancer outcomes with time. Materials and Methods: From 1988 to 2003, 251 men with high risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen more than 20 ng/ml and/or biopsy Gleason greater than 7) were identified in a cohort of 1,796 (14%) enrolled in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database. Temporal changes in clinicopathological characteristics and prostate specific antigen recurrence rates were examined stratified by 4, 4-year periods. Results: With time significantly more men were considered at high risk due to a high biopsy Gleason score relative to prior years, when the most common reason for being considered at high risk was increased PSA (p <0.001). Only 3% of high risk men from 2000 to 2003 had increased prostate specific antigen and high biopsy Gleason score compared to 23% from 1988 to 1991. With time there were no differences in biochemical recurrence rates (p = 0.147). Men with a high biopsy Gleason score and increased prostate specific antigen had worse outcomes than men with only a high Gleason score or men with only high prostate specific antigen (p = 0.046 and 0.081, respectively). On multivariate analysis that only included preoperative clinical characteristics only prostate specific antigen was an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen failure following radical prostatectomy (p = 0.014). There was a trend, which did not attain statistical significance, for higher biopsy Gleason scores and higher clinical stage to be associated with higher failure rates (p = 0.060 and 0.081, respectively). Conclusions: Patients are designated as high risk by Gleason grade more commonly now than early in the prostate specific antigen era. Outcomes in high risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy alone have not significantly improved with time. New treatment strategies, such as multimodality therapy, are needed to improve outcomes in high risk patients with prostate cancer.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 113-117 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Urology (Volume 177, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2007

Publication status

Published - 01/2007

ISSN

0022-5347

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 33845388656
  • PubMed: 17162017

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
3.73
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
citations
67
SciVal
Paper percentile
92
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
71
Captures
28

Funding Details

Supported by Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health R01CA100938 (WJA), National Institutes of Health Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Grant P50 CA92131-01A1 (WJA), Georgia Cancer Coalition (MKT), Department of Defense, Prostate Cancer Research Program (SJF) and American Urological Association Foundation/Astellas Rising Star in Urology Award (SJF).
FundersFunding numbers
American Urological Association Foundation/Astellas Rising Star
-
MKT
-
NIH
R01CA100938, P50 CA92131-01A1
DOD
-
NCI
P50CA092131
VA
-
GCC
-
PCRP
-
SJF
-