Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Child abuse, incarceration, and decisions about lifesustaining treatment

  • ,
  • Elliott Mark Weiss
    ,
  • Rebecca R. Seltzer
    ,
  • Rachel A.B. Dodge
    ,
  • Renee D. Boss
    ,
  • John D. Lantos(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • University of Washington
    ,
  • Johns Hopkins University
    ,
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well
  • SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Abstract

Most critical care interventions for children occur in the framework of a supportive environment with loving parents that are present at the bedside to help to guide medical interventions through shared decision-making. What happens, however, if the parents are precluded from being at the bedside because of legal entanglements? How should clinical decisions progress in those cases? In this Ethics Rounds, we present the case of an infant with severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy at birth whose mother was incarcerated shortly after delivery. We explore clinical and legal challenges that the medical team faces in determining best interests for the infant in this context and difficulties in deciding what therapies to provide and for how long.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Article number

e20180430

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Pediatrics (Volume 142, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2018

Publication status

Published - 12/2018

ISSN

0031-4005

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85057864901
  • PubMed: 30409842

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.20
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
40

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
49
Citation count
2