Child abuse, incarceration, and decisions about lifesustaining treatment
- ,
- Elliott Mark Weiss,
- Rebecca R. Seltzer,
- Rachel A.B. Dodge,
- Renee D. Boss,
- John D. Lantos(corresponding author)
- ,
- University of Washington,
- Johns Hopkins University,
- Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
Open access
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 3 Good Health and Well
- SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Abstract
Most critical care interventions for children occur in the framework of a supportive environment with loving parents that are present at the bedside to help to guide medical interventions through shared decision-making. What happens, however, if the parents are precluded from being at the bedside because of legal entanglements? How should clinical decisions progress in those cases? In this Ethics Rounds, we present the case of an infant with severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy at birth whose mother was incarcerated shortly after delivery. We explore clinical and legal challenges that the medical team faces in determining best interests for the infant in this context and difficulties in deciding what therapies to provide and for how long.
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
English (US)Article number
e20180430Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Pediatrics (Volume 142, Issue 6)Publication milestones
- Published - 12/2018
Publication status
ISSN
0031-4005Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85057864901
- PubMed: 30409842
