Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Clinical evaluation of the cartridge-based GeneXpert human papillomavirus assay in women referred for colposcopy

  • Mark H. Einstein(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Katherine M. Smith
    ,
  • Thomas E. Davis
    ,
  • Kathleen M. Schmeler
    ,
  • Daron G. Ferris
    ,
  • Ashlyn H. Savage
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Yeshiva University
    ,
  • University of Oklahoma
    ,
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
    ,
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    ,
  • ,
  • Medical University of South Carolina
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing is now being introduced as a potential primary screening test for improved detection of cervical precancer and cancer. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved tests are batch tests that take several hours to complete. A rapid, non-batch test might permit point-of-care (POC) testing, which can facilitate same-day screen and management strategies. For a non-batch, random-access platform (GeneXpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), a prototype hrHPV assay (Xpert) has been developed where testing for 14 hrHPV types can be completed in 1 h. In the first clinical evaluation, Xpert was compared to two validated hrHPV tests, the cobas HPV test (cobas, Roche Molecular Systems) and Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2, Qiagen), and to histologic outcomes using specimens from colposcopy referral populations at 7 clinical sites in the United States (n = 697). The sensitivity of Xpert for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) (n = 141) was equal to that of cobas (90.8% versus 90.8%, P = 1) and greater than that of hc2 (90.8% versus 81.6%, P =0.004). Xpert was more specific than cobas (42.6% versus 39.6%, P = 0.02) and less specific than hc2 (42.6% versus 47.7%, P<0.001). Similar results were observed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher (CIN3+) (n = 91). HPV16 detection by Xpert identified 41.8% of the CIN2+specimens with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 54.6%. By comparison, HPV16 detection by cobas identified 42.6% of the CIN2+specimens with a PPV of 55.0%. hrHPV detection by the Xpert demonstrated excellent clinical performance for identifying women with CIN2+and CIN3+that was comparable to that of currently available clinically validated tests.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 2089-2095 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of clinical microbiology (Volume 52, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2014

Publication status

Published - 06/2014

ISSN

0095-1137

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84901649719
  • PubMed: 24719440

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
2.53
SciVal
Author count
11
SciVal
citations
51
SciVal
Paper percentile
94
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.09
Fractional count
10
Fractional count
0.91
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
86
Captures
122