Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Nilotinib or Dasatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia and Pre-Existing Liver and/or Renal Dysfunction

  • Koji Sasaki
    ,
  • Amit Lahoti
    ,
  • Elias Jabbour
    ,
  • Preetesh Jain
    ,
  • Sherry Pierce
    ,
  • Gautam Borthakur
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background The safety and efficacy of front-line nilotinib and dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML-CP) with pre-existing liver and/or renal dysfunction are unknown. Patients and Methods We analyzed the adverse event rates, response rates, and survival rates of 215 patients with CML-CP with or without renal and/or liver dysfunction who had been treated with front-line nilotinib (n = 108) or dasatinib (n = 107). Results The overall median follow-up period was 49 months. At baseline, 6 dasatinib-treated patients (6%) had mild renal dysfunction and 13 (12%) had mild liver dysfunction. Also, 8 nilotinib-treated patients (7%) had mild renal dysfunction, 1 (1%) moderate renal dysfunction, and 9 (8%) mild liver dysfunction. No significant differences were found in the rate of complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, or molecular response by a 4.5 log reduction on the international scale between the organ function cohorts. Dasatinib- or nilotinib-treated patients with baseline renal dysfunction had a greater incidence of transient reversible acute kidney injury (P =.011 and P <.001), and nilotinib-treated patients with renal dysfunction had a greater incidence of bleeding (P <.001). Conclusion Patients with CML-CP and mild to moderate renal or liver dysfunction can be safely treated with front-line dasatinib or nilotinib and can achieve response rates similar to those of patients with CML-CP without organ dysfunction.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 152-162 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia (Volume 16, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/01/2016

Publication status

Published - 03/01/2016

ISSN

2152-2650

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84958843126
  • PubMed: 26796981
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-8636-1071/work/68887759

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
11
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.40
SciVal
Author count
13
SciVal
Paper percentile
74
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.08
Fractional count
12
Fractional count
0.92
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
33
Citation count
29

Funding Details

This study was supported in part by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672 and Award Number P01 CA049639 from the National Cancer Institute . J.C. received research support from Ariad, Bristol-Myer-Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva and is a consultant for Ariad, Bristol-Myer-Squibb, Novartis, and Pfizer. H.K. received research grants from Novaris, Bristol-Myer-Squibb, Pfizer, and Ariad. E.J. received consultancy fees from Ariad, Bristol-Myer-Squibb, Teva, and Pfizer. F.R. received research funding from Novartis and Bristol-Myer-Squibb. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
FundersFunding numbers
Bristol-Myer-Squibb
-
Novaris
-
NCI
P01CA049639
Pfizer
-
Novartis
-
MD Anderson Cancer Center
P01 CA049639, CA016672