Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Clinical use of dual image-guided localization system for spine radiosurgery

  • Ning Wen(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Nicole Walls
    ,
  • Jinkoo Kim
    ,
  • Jian Yue Jin
    ,
  • Sangroh Kim
    ,
  • Teamour Nurushev
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The recently released Novalis TX linac platform provides various image guided localization methods including a stereoscopic X-ray imaging technique (ExacTrac) and a volumetric cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging technique. The ExacTrac combined with the robotic six dimensional (6D) couch provides fast and accurate patient setup based on bony structures and offers "snap shot" imaging at any point during the treatment to detect patient motion. The CBCT offers a three dimensional (3D), volumetric image of the patient's setup with visualization of anatomic structures. However, each imaging system has a separate isocenter, which may not coincide with each other or with the linac isocenter. The aim of this paper was to compare the localization accuracy between Exactrac and CBCT for single fraction spine radiosurgery treatments. The study was performed for both phantom and patients (96 clinical treatments of 57 patients). The discrepancies between the isocenter between the ExacTrac and CBCT in four dimensions (three translations and one rotation) were recorded and statistically analyzed using two-tailed t-test.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 123-131 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment (Volume 11, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/2012

Publication status

Published - 04/2012

ISSN

1533-0346

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84877737726
  • PubMed: 22335406

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.11
Fractional count
8
Fractional count
0.89
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.08
SciVal
Author count
9
SciVal
citations
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
53
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
22
Citation count
5