Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Colorectal cancer prevention by a CLEAR principles–based colonoscopy protocol: an observational study

  • Sudha Xirasagar(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Yuqi Wu
    ,
  • ,
  • Jiajia Zhang
    ,
  • Stephanie Chiodini
    ,
  • Piet C. de Groen
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of South Carolina
    ,
  • California State University Monterey Bay
    ,
  • South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
    ,
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background and Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention by colonoscopy has been lower than expected. We studied CRC prevention outcomes of a colonoscopy protocol based on Clean the colon, Look Everywhere, and complete Abnormality Removal (CLEAR) principles. Methods: This observational follow-up study studied patients provided screening colonoscopy at a free-standing private ambulatory surgery center in South Carolina by 80 endoscopists from October 2001 to December 2014, followed through December 2015. The colonoscopy protocol, optimized for polyp clearance, featured in-person bowel preparation instructions reinforced by phone, polyp search and removal throughout insertion and gradual withdrawal with circumferential tip movements, and a team approach using all personnel present to maximize polyp detection, patient safety, and clear-margin polypectomy including requesting repeat inspection or additional tissue removal. Outcome measures were postscreening lifetime CRC risk relative to Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-18 and interval cancer rate (postcolonoscopy CRCs among cancer-free patients at screening). Results: Of 25,862 patients (mean age, 58.1 years; 52% black; 205,522 person-years of observation), 159 had CRC at screening and 67 patients developed interval CRC. The interval CRC rate was 3.34 per 10,000 person-years of observation, 5.79 and 2.24 among patients with and without adenomas, respectively. The rate was similar among older patients (mean age 68.5 years at screening) and with prolonged follow-up. Postscreening lifetime CRC risk was 1.6% (bootstrap 95% confidence interval, 1.3%-1.8%) versus 4.7% in SEER-18, 67% lower. Subgroups with mean screening ages of 50 and 68.5 years showed risk reductions of 80% and 72%, respectively. The adverse event rate was less than usually reported rates: perforation 2.6 per 10,000, bleeding with hospitalization 2.4 per 10,000, and no deaths. Conclusions: A colonoscopy protocol optimized for polyp clearance prevented 67% of CRC compared with a SEER-18 population given ongoing population screening.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 905-916.e4

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Volume 91, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/2020

Publication status

Published - 04/2020

ISSN

0016-5107

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85079523781
  • PubMed: 31816316
  • ORCID: /0000-0001-6511-156X/work/172679008

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
11
Captures
48
Social media
158

Funding Details

DISCLOSURE: The following authors received research support for this study from the National Institutes of Health: S. Xirasagar, P. de Groen (grants 1R21CA202477 and 3R21CA202477-01S1); P. de Groen (grant R01DK106130) and the University of Minnesota. The funding organization had no role in study planning, interpretation of findings, manuscript preparation, or journal submission. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
FundersFunding numbers
P. de Groen
-
NIH
1R21CA202477
NIDDK
R01DK106130
UM
-