Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparability of computer and paper-and-pencil versions of algebra and biology assessments

  • Do Hong Kim(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Huynh Huynh
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte
    ,
  • University of South Carolina
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

This study examined comparability of student scores obtained from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of the large-scale statewide end-of-course (EOC) examinations in the two subject areas of Algebra and Biology. Evidence in support of comparability of computerized and paper-based tests was sought by examining scale scores, item parameter estimates, test characteristic curves, test information functions, Rasch ability estimates at the content domain level, and the equivalence of the construct. Overall, the results support the comparability of computerized and paper-based tests at the itemlevel, subtest-level, and whole test-level in both subject areas. No evidence was found to suggest that the administration mode changed the construct being measured.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1-29 (29 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment (Volume 6, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2007

Publication status

Published - 12/2007

ISSN

1540-2525

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 37649023386

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
17
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.23
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
70

PlumX

Citation count
20
Captures
40