Comparability of computer and paper-and-pencil versions of algebra and biology assessments
- Do Hong Kim(corresponding author),
- Huynh Huynh
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
- University of South Carolina
Abstract
This study examined comparability of student scores obtained from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of the large-scale statewide end-of-course (EOC) examinations in the two subject areas of Algebra and Biology. Evidence in support of comparability of computerized and paper-based tests was sought by examining scale scores, item parameter estimates, test characteristic curves, test information functions, Rasch ability estimates at the content domain level, and the equivalence of the construct. Overall, the results support the comparability of computerized and paper-based tests at the itemlevel, subtest-level, and whole test-level in both subject areas. No evidence was found to suggest that the administration mode changed the construct being measured.
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
English (US)Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1-29 (29 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment (Volume 6, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 12/2007
Publication status
ISSN
1540-2525Publication IDs
- Scopus: 37649023386
