Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin

  • Masatoshi Nakajima
    ,
  • Nobuharu Kanemura
    ,
  • Patricia N.R. Pereira
    ,
  • Junji Tagami
    ,
  • David H. Pashley(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Institute of Science Tokyo
    ,
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To compare bond strengths of resins to acid-etched wet vs. dry dentin. Materials and Methods: Human third molars were bonded with One-Step (OS), Single Bond (SB) or Clearfil PhotoBond (PB) under control moist or air-dried (5 s air blast) conditions. Tensile bond strengths were tested using the microtensile bond testing method. Scanning electron microscopy was done to evaluate the quality and thickness of the hybrid layers following polishing and acid plus NaOCl-challenge. Results: The tensile bond strengths of OS, SB and PB were significantly (P< 0.01) lower (8-19 MPa) to air-dried dentin than to moist dentin (39-50 MPa). No hybrid layers were seen in the air-dried specimens bonded with OS or SB, while relatively thin hybrid layers were produced by PB. In contrast, moist dentin produced high bond strengths with all bonding systems and created thicker, acid/NaOCl-resistant hybrid layers. These results support the predictions of a previously published morphologic model and offer a morphologic explanation for the differences in bond strengths between wet vs. dry bonds.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 324-328 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American journal of dentistry (Volume 13, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2000

Publication status

Published - 12/2000

ISSN

0894-8275

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0034575171
  • PubMed: 11764127

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.10
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
57
SciVal
Paper percentile
86

PlumX

Citation count
67
Captures
34

Funding Details

FunderFunding number
NIDCR
R01DE006427