Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparing Outcomes of Active Student and Observer Roles in Nursing Simulation

  • Teresa A. Bates(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Leslie C. Moore
    ,
  • Debbie Greene
    ,
  • Joan S. Cranford
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Background Because of large class sizes and limited resources, students participating in high-fidelity simulation experiences may be assigned to an observer role as opposed to an active nursing role. Purpose Educators need to determine if anxiety levels and student learning outcomes are comparable for students in active and observer roles. Methods A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 132 prelicensure baccalaureate students. Active nursing roles consisted of primary care, documentation, and medication nurse roles. Observer role students were provided with resources to guide them with developing their observational skills and achieving the simulation objectives. Results There were no significant differences between simulation roles for anxiety levels, satisfaction with learning, self-confidence in learning, clinical ability, problem solving, confidence in clinical practice, and collaboration. Conclusions These findings suggest that either role is an appropriate assignment during simulation. Educators should identify ways to be supportive and reduce anxiety in students during simulation experiences.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 216-221 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Nurse educator (Volume 44, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/01/2019

Publication status

Published - 07/01/2019

ISSN

0363-3624

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85065236065
  • PubMed: 30234692

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
6
SciVal
FWCI
2.80
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
27
Captures
93