Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparison of borehole geophysics, CPT, resistivity, GPR, and high-resolution seismic data across a shallow structure in unconsolidated sediments

  • Tom J. Temples
    ,
  • Douglas E. Wyatt
    ,
  • Michael G. Waddell
  • United States Department of Energy
    ,
  • AECOM
    ,
  • University of South Carolina
Scholary Output:
Contribution to conference
Paper
Peer-review

Related Event

Title

1995 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Annual Meeting, SEG 1995

Event type

Other

Date

10/08/1995 - 10/13/1995

Location

HoustonUnited States

Abstract

The geological characterization of the shallow subsurface in the unconsolidated sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, and other unconsolidated sediment regimes, may involve faulting and channeling not readily detectable by conventional drilling and mapping. A knowledge of these features is required in environmental and geotechnical studies in areas that may have critical impact to groundwater flow and contaminant transport. In many cases, shallow structural influences are missed during site characterization. A case study is presented using ground penetrating radar (GPR) and high resolution seismic data, compared with a geological interpretation from borehole logs and core data, with Wenner and dipole-dipole resistivity data and with cone penetrometer (CPT) data in an area where shallow structure is probable and contamination exists. This study suggests that a correlation may be made for structures imaged by ground penetrating radar and high resolution seismic data. The additional information provided by Wenner and dipole-dipole resistivity surveys, when viewed separately from the other data sources, does not allow for an adequate picture of the shallow faulting. The data from the cone penetrometer (CPT) investigation, when compared to existing well data, did not define the nature of the shallow structures. A comparison of all of the techniques allows for the small scale shallow structures, imaged by the continuous techniques (GPR, seismic) to be compared with the non-continuous techniques (borings, CPT) used to define lithology. Since the various techniques have differing depths of investigation, an effective depth of influence of the shallow structures may be estimated.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to conference
Paper
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 381-384 (4 pages)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1995

Publication status

Published - 1995

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85054387368

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

Funding Details

This research was performed by the Westinghouse Savannah River Company for the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DEAC09-89SR18035. Special thanks go to Traci Mickley and Shannon Vick of Westinghouse for graphics support and to Mary Harris and Rolf Aadland for the geological cross-section. GPR support was provided by Boyd Sexton of Microseeps and Murali Ramaswamy of the Houston Advanced Research Center.
FunderFunding numbers
U. S. Department of Energy
-