Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparison of continuous step-and-shoot versus step-and-shoot acquisition SPECT

  • Zong Jian Cao(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Christophe Maunoury
    ,
  • Charles C. Chen
    ,
  • Lawrence E. Holder
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

This study compared the quality of SPECT images obtained with step-and- shoot mode (SSM) and continuous step-and-shoot mode (CSSM). Methods: Computer simulations of SSM and CSSM were performed with a two-dimensional Shepp- Logan head phantom and a high-resolution parallel-hole collimator. The effects of noise and photon attenuation were examined. Results: Without noise and without attenuation, small structures in reconstructed images obtained using fast CSSM (less than 4 sec per view plus the moving time from one view to the next) were slightly blurred and rotated in the opposite direction of detector motion. With both noise and attenuation, these artifacts were not visible, and the image quality obtained from CSSM, especially from fast CSSM, was improved as compared to that resulting from the corresponding SSM due to the increasing number of counts. The improvement of image quality became less significant with increasing acquisition time and in the presence of attenuation. Conclusion: For fast SPECT, CSSM provided better image quality than the corresponding SSM, especially when attenuation effects were not present. For relatively long time SPECT without attenuation compensation that is typical for clinical studies, the image quality of CSSM was similar to that of SSM.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 2037-2040 (4 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Nuclear Medicine (Volume 37, Issue 12)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/1996

Publication status

Published - 12/1996

ISSN

0161-5505

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0030482440
  • PubMed: 8970530

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
11
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.25
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
62

PlumX

Captures
22
Citation count
17