Comparison of electrically and mechanically induced soleus H-reflex depression
- ,
- D. M. Koceja
- Indiana University Bloomington
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present investigation was to compare the responses of mechanically-evoked and electrically-evoked conditioning among three different stimulus intensities and provide possible insight in determining whether these two types of inhibitory conditioning demonstrate the same response across the motor pool. Methods: The soleus H-reflex was tested under three different stimulus intensities (25%Hmax, 50%Hma'x, and Hmax), and peak to peak amplitudes were recorded after either mechanical or electrical conditioning. For electrical conditioning, the ankle was held at 90 degrees, whereas mechanical conditioning utilized a 10 degree passive dorsiflexion at 15 degrees/sec back to the 90 degree position. All H-reflex measurements were recorded with the ankle at 90 degrees. Results: A 3 × 2 (stimulus intensity x treatment condition) repeated measures ANOVA indicated significant main effects for stimulus intensity (FGG=16.23, p=.003) and condition (FGG=28.48; p<.001), as well as an interaction (F(2,18)=6.59, p=.008). Simple main effects identified significantly more H-reflex depression for mechanical conditioning (94%, 91%, and 44%) compared to electrical conditioning (65%, 55%, and 19%) at 25%Hmax, 50%Hmax, and Hmax, respectively. Conclusions: There appears to be more mechanically than electrically stimulated H-reflex depression when testing at 25%Hmax, 50%Hmax, and Hmax. These results demonstrate the influence of Ia discharge properties on H-reflex depression and may suggest differences in the affinity of Ia terminals to intrinsic presynaptic inhibition at different stimulus intensities.
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
English (US)Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 413-419 (7 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology (Volume 46, Issue 7-8)Publication milestones
- Published - 11/2006
Publication status
ISSN
0301-150XPublication IDs
- Scopus: 33845382341
- PubMed: 17191734
