Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparison of the Perspectives of Medical Students and Residents on the Surgery Learning Environment

  • Sarah Jung(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Jacob Greenberg
    ,
  • Ann P. O'Rourke
    ,
  • Rebecca M. Minter
    ,
  • Eugene Foley
    ,
  • Corrine I. Voils
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background: The learning environment plays a critical role in learners' satisfaction and outcomes. However, we often lack insight into learners' perceptions and assessments of these environments. It can be difficult to discern learners' expectations, making their input critical. When medical students and surgery residents are asked to evaluate their teachers, what do they focus on? Materials and methods: Open-ended comments from medical students' evaluations of residents and attending surgeons and from residents' evaluations of attendings during the 2016-2017 academic year were analyzed. Content analysis was used, and codes derived from the data. A matrix of theme by learner role was created to distinguish differences between medical student and resident learners. Subthemes were grouped based on similarity into high-order themes. Results: Two overarching themes were Creating a positive environment for learning by modeling professional behaviors and Intentionally engaging learners in training and educational opportunities. Medical students and residents made similar comments for the subthemes of appropriate demeanor, tone and dialog, respect, effective direct instruction, feedback, debriefing, giving appropriate levels of autonomy, and their expectations as team members on a service. Differences existed in the subthemes of punctuality, using evidence, clinical knowledge, efficiency, direct interactions with patients, learning outcomes, and career decisions. Conclusions: Faculty development efforts should target professional communication, execution of teaching skills, and relationships among surgeons, other providers, and patients. Attendings should make efforts to discuss their approach to clinical decision making and patient interactions and help residents and medical students voice their opinions and questions through trusting adult learner-teacher relationships.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 187-194 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Surgical Research (Volume 258)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2021

Publication status

Published - 02/2021

ISSN

0022-4804

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85091909998
  • PubMed: 33011450

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
59
Citation count
18

Funding Details

Funding: This work was supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, through the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, grant UL1TR002373. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Dr Voils' effort was supported by a Research Career Scientist Award (RCS 14-443) from the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service. Authors' contributions: S.J. and C.I.V. contributed to study conceptualization, design, data analysis and interpretation, and writing and revision of the manuscript. J.G. A.P.O. R.M.M. and E.F. contributed to data interpretation and manuscript writing and revision. Funding: This work was supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award program, through the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, grant UL1TR002373 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Dr Voils' effort was supported by a Research Career Scientist Award (RCS 14-443) from the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service .
FundersFunding numbers
National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
-
Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service
-
NIH
-
NCATS
RCS 14-443, UL1TR002373