Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparison of transfection agents in forming complexes with ferumoxides, cell labeling efficiency, and cellular viability

  • Ali Syed Arbab(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Gene Thomus Yocum
    ,
  • Lindsey Bashaw Wilson
    ,
  • Ashari Parwana
    ,
  • Elaine Kay Jordan
    ,
  • Heather Kalish
*Corresponding author for this work
  • National Institutes of Health
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

By complexing ferumoxides or superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) to transfection agents (TAs), it is possible to magnetically label mammalian cells. There has been no systematic study comparing TAs complexed to SPIO as far as cell labeling efficiency and viability. This study investigates the toxicity and labeling efficiency at various doses of FEs complexed to different TAs in mammalian cells. Different classes of TAs were used, such as polycationic amines, dendrimers, and lipid-based agents. Cellular toxicity was measured using doses of TAs from 1 to 50 μg/mL in incubation media. Iron incorporation efficiency was measured by combining various amounts of FEs and different doses of TAs. Lipofectamine2000 showed toxicity at lowest dose (1 μg/mL), whereas FuGENE6 and low molecular weight poly-L-lysine (PLL showed the least toxicity. SPIO labeling efficiency was similar with high-molecular-weight PLL (388.1 kDa) and superfect, whereas FuGENE6 and low-molecular-weight PLL were inefficient in labeling cells. Concentrations of 25 to 50 μg/mL of FEs complexed to TAs in media resulted in sufficient endocytosis of the SPIO into endosomes to detect cells on cellular magnetic resonance imaging.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 24-32 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Molecular Imaging (Volume 3, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2004

Publication status

Published - 01/2004

ISSN

1535-3508

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 3042541033
  • PubMed: 15142409

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
5.66
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
183
SciVal
Paper percentile
97
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
44
Citation count
201