Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Concordance of reflectance confocal microscopy and gene expression profiling for melanocytic lesions with uncertain malignant potential: A case series

  • Christian Gronbeck
    ,
  • Harold Rabinovitz
    ,
  • N. P. Margaret Oliviero
    ,
  • Jane M. Grant-Kels(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Connecticut
    ,
  • Augusta University
    ,
  • Skin and Cancer Associates
    ,
  • University of Florida
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

For a small yet significant proportion of melanocytic lesions, histopathologic analysis may be unable to definitively evaluate malignant potential. These cases may signify a specific need for newer ancillary diagnostic technologies, including in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and gene expression profiling (GEP), both of which are highly sensitive in the diagnosis of melanoma. We report four cases of clinically suspicious melanocytic lesions that lacked definitive malignant features on histopathology and that were aided by use of RCM and GEP. Three of the four cases showed concordance between RCM and GEP in the diagnosis of melanoma. In one case, RCM was suggestive of melanoma; on the other hand, GEP and histopathology supported a final diagnosis of compound Spitz nevus. These cases support the role of RCM as a novel, non-invasive diagnostic tool to aid in the diagnosis of clinically suspicious melanocytic lesions with uncertain malignant potential, although RCM may have relatively lower accuracy for some atypical spitzoid lesions.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 623-628 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Cutaneous Pathology (Volume 50, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2023

Publication status

Published - 07/2023

ISSN

0303-6987

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85150925700
  • PubMed: 36944578

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
3
Captures
8
Mentions
1