Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Considerations for fabrication of implant-supported posterior restorations

  • Gerard J. Chiche(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Alain Pinault
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Louisiana Stale University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Implant-supported posterior restorations must be fabricated following establisbed prosthodontic principles. The need for screw-retained abutments and the narrow diameter of root-form implants dictate additional treatment protocols that fall beyond the scope of conventional prosthodontics. Cemented restorations offer simplicity and good control of morphology, but can only be considered if removal or no reservicing of the restoration is anticipated. Screw-retained restorations allow for reservicing or remediation but necessitate centering of the retaining screw within the occlusal anatomy. When the implant is misaligned, axis problems are solved with preangled copings, custom copings, or double frameworks. The diameter of root-form implants is significantly smaller than posterior natural teeth, and the emergence of the restorations must be progressively flared to achieve proper morphology. Limited interocclusal space and implant placement may dictate restoring posterior teeth as premolars, selecting a short abutment or a nonsegmented ("UCLA") abutment, or overlapping the crowns over the soft tissues. The final abutment selection is best assisted with a diagnostic waxing and with provisional restorations anticipating the completed treatment.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 37-44 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Journal of Prosthodontics (Volume 4, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1991

Publication status

Published - 1991

ISSN

0893-2174

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0026037479
  • PubMed: 2012669

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Citation count
29
Captures
26