Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Creating a clinically useful data collection form for the DASH questionnaire

  • Leigh A. Lehman
    ,
  • Bhagwant S. Sindhu
    ,
  • Jessica Johnson
    ,
  • Craig A. Velozo
  • University of South Carolina - Upstate
    ,
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    ,
  • Amedisys Home Health Services
    ,
  • University of Florida
    ,
  • System Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE. We generated a clinically useful data collection form for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. This data collection form is designed to aid in measuring change and goal setting. METHOD. Rasch analysis was used to generate three data collection forms for constructs on the DASH (gross motor, fine motor, and symptoms; N = 960). A form was completed to represent the findings from 1 study participant. Admission and discharge data were illustrated for one of the three sections (gross motor activity). Possible goals were indicated on the admission form. The discharge form illustrates whether these goals have been achieved. RESULTS. Figures illustrate the utility of the forms in observing functional change from admission to discharge and how the forms aid in goal setting. CONCLUSION. Use of the data collection form has many positive implications. This type of form could aid in goal setting and treatment planning.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 45-54 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Occupational Therapy (Volume 65, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2011

Publication status

Published - 01/2011

ISSN

0272-9490

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 79952058081
  • PubMed: 21309371

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
7
SciVal
FWCI
0.91
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
58
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
14
Captures
44