Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Critical Review on Methacrylate Resin-based Root Canal Sealers

  • Young Kyung Kim
    ,
  • Simone Grandini
    ,
  • Jason M. Ames
    ,
  • Li sha Gu
    ,
  • Sung Kyo Kim
    ,
  • David H. Pashley
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Kyungpook National University
    ,
  • University of Siena
    ,
  • Private Endodontic Practice
    ,
  • Sun Yat-Sen University
    ,
  • ,
  • Texas A&M University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Four generations of methacrylate resin-based sealers have been available commercially. Three of these were introduced during the last 5 years when the concept of simultaneous bonding of root canal sealers to root filling materials and dentin was popularized. Methods: This article presents an overview of methacrylate resin-based sealers, with the objectives of clarifying the behavior of these materials and delineating their limitations in clinical application. Results: The first generation sealer was introduced in the mid-1970s. The initial enthusiasm associated with its use eventually diminished as a result of its suboptimal physical, biologic, and clinical properties. With advances in self-etching adhesive technology acquired from adhesive dentistry, methacrylate resin-based sealers were reintroduced in the beginning of the 21st century to support the introduction of bondable root canal filling materials. Three different generations of these sealers have since been available commercially. Although some in vitro studies on the sealing ability, self-etching potential, biocompatibility, and removability of the sealers showed better potential over conventional nonbonding sealers, accomplishing the ideal goal of a monoblock in the root canal space with these materials is still regarded as a major challenge. Conclusions: On the basis of the in vitro and in vivo data available to date, there appears to be no clear benefit with the use of methacrylate resin-based sealers in conjunction with adhesive root filling materials at this point in their development.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 383-399 (17 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of endodontics (Volume 36, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2010

Publication status

Published - 03/2010

ISSN

0099-2399

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 76449090411
  • PubMed: 20171352

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
4.62
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
citations
112
SciVal
Paper percentile
97
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
350
Citation count
149

Funding Details

This study was supported by funds provided by Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia . The authors are thankful to Mrs Michelle Barnes for secretarial support.
FundersFunding numbers
Dental Research Center School of Dentistry
-Medical College of Georgia-