Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Defending the Doctrine of the Mean Against Counterexamples: A General Strategy

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Aristotle's doctrine of the mean states that each moral virtue stands opposed to two types of vice: one of excess and one of deficiency, respectively. Critics claim that some virtues – like honesty, fair-mindedness, and patience – are counterexamples to Aristotle's doctrine. Here, I develop a generalizable strategy to defend the doctrine of the mean against such counterexamples. I argue that not only is the doctrine of the mean defensible, but taking it seriously also allows us to gain substantial insight into particular virtues. Failure to take the doctrine seriously, moreover, exposes us to the risk of mistaking certain vices for virtues.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 267-290 (24 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (Volume 105, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2024

Publication status

Published - 06/2024

ISSN

0279-0750

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85190768971

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
2
Mentions
1
Captures
2

Funding Details

This project was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. I am especially grateful to Christian Miller, Tobias Flattery, Adam Kadlac, Wes Siscoe, members of the Honesty Project at Wake Forest University, and two anonymous reviewers for providing feedback on various stages of this project.
FunderFunding numbers
JTF
-