Defining our Terms: Bringing Rigour to Ethnic Studies
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewSustainable Development Goals
- SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Abstract
For decades, political scientists have grappled with the role identity has played in ethnic conflict. Surprisingly, these scholars have been unsuccessful in rigorously conceptualising some key terms in the field of ethnic studies. How can the causal forces of ethnic strife be unravelled if scholars cannot even agree on the meanings of essential concepts? This article carefully delineates the differences between ethnicity, ethnic groups and ethnic group identity, while showing the conceptual mistakes of some of the field's leading scholars. Often treated synonymously, these concepts are quite distinct: ignoring this not only makes for sloppy scholarship, but has grave policy consequences.
Publication Information
Output type
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
English (US)Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 70-76 (7 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Politics (Volume 32, Issue 2)Publication milestones
- Published - 06/2012
Publication status
Published - 06/2012
ISSN
0263-3957Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84860635797
Publication metrics
Metrics
SciVal
FWCI
0.61
SciVal
Author count
1
SciVal
citations
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
45
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
8
Citation count
3
