Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Defining our Terms: Bringing Rigour to Ethnic Studies

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Abstract

For decades, political scientists have grappled with the role identity has played in ethnic conflict. Surprisingly, these scholars have been unsuccessful in rigorously conceptualising some key terms in the field of ethnic studies. How can the causal forces of ethnic strife be unravelled if scholars cannot even agree on the meanings of essential concepts? This article carefully delineates the differences between ethnicity, ethnic groups and ethnic group identity, while showing the conceptual mistakes of some of the field's leading scholars. Often treated synonymously, these concepts are quite distinct: ignoring this not only makes for sloppy scholarship, but has grave policy consequences.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 70-76 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Politics (Volume 32, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2012

Publication status

Published - 06/2012

ISSN

0263-3957

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84860635797

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.61
SciVal
Author count
1
SciVal
citations
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
45
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
8
Citation count
3