Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Depression screening and patient outcomes in cancer: A systematic review

  • Anna Meijer
    ,
  • Michelle Roseman
    ,
  • Katherine Milette
    ,
  • James C. Coyne
    ,
  • Michael E. Stefanek
    ,
  • Roy C. Ziegelstein
  • University of Groningen
    ,
  • McGill University
    ,
  • Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
    ,
  • University of Pennsylvania
    ,
  • Indiana University Bloomington
    ,
  • Johns Hopkins University
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: Several practice guidelines recommend screening for depression in cancer care, but no systematic reviews have examined whether there is evidence that depression screening benefits cancer patients. The objective was to evaluate the potential benefits of depression screening in cancer patients by assessing the (1) accuracy of depression screening tools; (2) effectiveness of depression treatment; and (3) effect of depression screening, either alone or in the context of comprehensive depression care, on depression outcomes. Methods: Data sources were CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, ISI, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and SCOPUS databases through January 24, 2011; manual journal searches; reference lists; citation tracking; trial registry reviews. Articles on cancer patients were included if they (1) compared a depression screening instrument to a valid criterion for major depressive disorder (MDD); (2) compared depression treatment with placebo or usual care in a randomized controlled trial (RCT); (3) assessed the effect of screening on depression outcomes in a RCT. Results: There were 19 studies of screening accuracy, 1 MDD treatment RCT, but no RCTs that investigated effects of screening on depression outcomes. Screening accuracy studies generally had small sample sizes (median = 17 depression cases) and used exploratory methods to set sample-specific cutoff scores that varied substantially across studies. A nurse-delivered intervention for MDD reduced depressive symptoms moderately (effect size = 0.37). Conclusions: The one treatment study reviewed reported modest improvement in depressive symptoms, but no evidence was found on whether or not depression screening in cancer patients, either alone or in the context of optimal depression care, improves depression outcomes compared to usual care. Depression screening in cancer should be evaluated in a RCT in which all patients identified as depressed, either through screening or via physician recognition and referral in a control group, have access to comprehensive depression care.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Article number

e27181

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

PloS one (Volume 6, Issue 11)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/14/2011

Publication status

Published - 11/14/2011

ISSN

1932-6203

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 81055145725
  • PubMed: 22110613

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
59
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.08
Fractional count
11
Fractional count
0.92
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
1.23
SciVal
Author count
12
SciVal
Paper percentile
93
SciVal
Top percentile
10

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
67
Captures
153