Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Design and Application of an Area-Level Suicide Risk Index with Spatial Correlation

  • Jaesang Sung
    ,
  • Qihua Qiu(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Will Davis
    ,
  • Rusty Tchernis
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

In this study, we design a novel model-based Suicide Risk Index to assess and identify area-level suicide risk. We construct a Bayesian Spatial Factor Analysis model, treating suicide risk as an underlying latent factor that manifests through multiple observable variables. Our method is applied to county-level data from multiple sources in Florida and Georgia. We utilize 14 manifest variables classified into three dimensions: “suicidal behavior”, “mental illness”, and “substance abuse.” The posterior means and 95% credible intervals of the model-based SRI ranks are estimated. Our results show substantial disagreement between the SRI rankings and age-adjusted suicide rate which only captures reported suicides. Furthermore, we find strong evidence of spatial spillovers in suicide risk across counties. The “mental illness” dimension of our model represents the greatest contribution to county suicide risk in Florida while the “suicidal behavior” dimension accounts for the most variation in suicide risk in Georgia. We also test the sensitivity of our model-based SRI ranks to an alternative spatial correlation specification and different methods for imputing missing data. Finally, we show that greater deprivation and social fragmentation, each estimated using the same SFA model, are positively associated with suicide risk. Our findings suggest that existing suicide prevention guidelines used by policymakers to identify high-risk counties based on suicide death rates may be misleading. The model-based SRI identifies counties with both high suicide risks and greater likelihoods of transferring their risks across county borders. Policy may benefit from singling out these counties for aid and targeted interventions.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 77-104 (28 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Social Indicators Research (Volume 161, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2021
  • Published - 05/2022

Publication status

Published - 05/2022

ISSN

0303-8300

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85116750723

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
4
Captures
20
Mentions
1

Funding Details

We would like to thank Charles Courtemanche, James Marton, and Nicolas Ziebarth for their comments. Any errors are, of course, our own.