Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid prototyping

  • Ariane Plaisance
    ,
  • Holly O. Witteman
    ,
  • Annie LeBlanc
    ,
  • Jennifer Kryworuchko
    ,
  • Daren Keith Heyland
    ,
  • Mark H. Ebell
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Centre intégré en santé et services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches
    ,
  • Université Laval
    ,
  • University of British Columbia
    ,
  • Queen's University Kingston
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background Upon admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), all patients should discuss their goals of care and express their wishes concerning life-sustaining interventions (e.g., cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)). Without such discussions, interventions that prolong life at the cost of decreasing its quality may be used without appropriate guidance from patients. Objectives To adapt an existing decision aid about CPR to create a wiki-based decision aid individually adapted to each patient’s risk factors; and to document the use of a wiki platform for this purpose. Methods We conducted three weeks of ethnographic observation in our ICU to observe intensivists and patients discussing goals of care and to identify their needs regarding decision making. We interviewed intensivists individually. Then we conducted three rounds of rapid prototyping involving 15 patients and 11 health professionals. We recorded and analyzed all discussions, interviews and comments, and collected sociodemographic data. Using a wiki, a website that allows multiple users to contribute or edit content, we adapted the decision aid accordingly and added the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) prediction rule calculator. Results We added discussion of invasive mechanical ventilation. The final decision aid comprises values clarification, risks and benefits of CPR and invasive mechanical ventilation, statistics about CPR, and a synthesis section. We added the GO-FAR prediction calculator as an online adjunct to the decision aid. Although three rounds of rapid prototyping simplified the information in the decision aid, 60% (n = 3/5) of the patients involved in the last cycle still did not understand its purpose. Conclusions Wikis and user-centered design can be used to adapt decision aids to users’ needs and local contexts. Our wiki platform allows other centers to adapt our tools, reducing duplication and accelerating scale-up. Physicians need training in shared decision making skills about goals of care and in using the decision aid. A video version of the decision aid could clarify its purpose.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Article number

e0191844

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

PloS one (Volume 13, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2018

Publication status

Published - 02/2018

ISSN

1932-6203

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85042193131
  • PubMed: 29447297

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.08
Fractional count
12
Fractional count
0.92
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
5
SciVal
FWCI
0.33
SciVal
Author count
13
SciVal
Paper percentile
67

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
103
Citation count
17

Funding Details

This study was supported by the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, by the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Secteur Alphonse-Desjardins) and by the Fondation de l’Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis The funders had no role to play in study design, data collection, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank the Vice-décanat à la recherche et aux études supérieures and the Faculty of Medicine at Université Laval, the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Secteur Alphonse-Desjardins) and the Fondation de l’Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis. The authors would also like to thank the nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals who work in the ICU at l’Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis. Special thanks to Nathalie Boucher, Isabelle Michel, Mélanie Constantin, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Michael E. Wilson, Christopher Cox, Rim Charaf, Dario Gomez, Fatoumata Tounkara, Carmen Irambona-Nyandwi, Samuel Bilodeau, Alexis Turgeon-Fournier, Jean-Michel Constantin, Matthieu Ratthé, Todd Gorman, Frédérick Noiseux, Mohamed Diah Hachmi, Jean-François Bellemare, Christine Drouin, Benoît Duhaime, Simon Bordeleau, Ann Laberge, Charles Lacroix, Émilie Dubois, Jean-François Tremblay, and Amélie Plaisance. Our utmost respect and appreciation goes to the critically-ill patients and their family members who shared their most personal thoughts and dedicated their time to help improve the creation of this decision aid aiming to improve patient care.
FunderFunding numbers
Fondation de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
-