Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Diagnosis of mixed acid-base disorders in diabetic ketoacidosis

  • W. D. Paulson(corresponding author)
    ,
  • M. F. Gadallah
*Corresponding author for this work
  • LSU Health Sciences Center - Shreveport
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

In diabetic ketoacidosis, a mixed acid-base disorder is suggested when the anion gap increase (ΔAG) does not equal the bicarbonate decrease (ΔHCO3), or when the ΔAG/ΔHCO3 ratio does not equal 1.0. It is widely assumed that ΔAG/ΔHCO3 is significantly different from 1.0 when it is less than 0.8 or greater than 1.2. The validity of these ratio limits were examined by analyzing a normal control group of 68 subjects and 27 diabetic ketoacidosis admissions that had no evidence of mixed disorders. In the 27 ketoacidosis admissions, regression analysis showed that ΔAG was predicted to equal ΔHCO3, as expected in pure anion gap acidosis: ΔAG = 1.0ΔHCO3 (r = 0.744, p < 0.001). It was found that ΔAG is significantly different from ΔHCO3 when they differ by more than 8 mEq/L, and equivalently, ΔAG/ΔHCO3 is significantly different from 1.0 when it is less than (1.0 - 8/ΔHCO3) or greater than (1.0 + 8/ΔHCO3). These criteria from regression analysis suggested that 4% of the 27 pure anion gap acidoses, and 3% of the control group, had mixed disorders. In contrast, the ratio limits of 0.8 and 1.2 suggested 56% of the pure anion gap acidoses, and 94% of the control group, had mixed disorders. It was concluded that mixed disorders are overdiagnosed by the ratio limits of 0.8 and 1.2. Mixed disorders are more accurately detected by noting whether ΔAG and ΔHCO3 differ by more than 8 mEq/L.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 295-300 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of the Medical Sciences (Volume 306, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1993

Publication status

Published - 1993

ISSN

0002-9629

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0027421501
  • PubMed: 8238083

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
9
Citation count
20