Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of visual urethral mobility exam versus Q-Tip test: A randomized crossover trial

  • Barbara Lynn Robinson(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Elizabeth Joanne Geller
    ,
  • Brent Ashley Parnell
    ,
  • Andrea Kuntaraf Crane
    ,
  • Mary Lee Jannelli
    ,
  • Ellen Casper Wells
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a visual urethral mobility examination (VUME) with a Q-Tip test in the assessment of urethral hypermobility. STUDY DESIGN: Subjects were randomized to a VUME or Q-Tip test first, followed by the alternate assessment. Outcomes included hypermobile, not hypermobile, or indeterminate. Hypermobility was defined as 30° or greater from the horizontal. Pain perception and test preference were assessed. RESULTS: For the 54 subjects, 61.1% demonstrated hypermobility on VUME vs 72.2% on the Q-Tip test (P =.39). Assessment of hypermobility was correlated between the 2 tools (ρ = 0.47, P =.001). Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity for VUME were 88%, 56%, 78%, and 71%, respectively, with a Q-Tip test as the reference standard. Mean pain score on visual analog scale was 0.72 for VUME and 3.15 for Q-tip test (P <.001). VUME was preferred by 83% of subjects. CONCLUSION: VUME is a diagnostic alternative to the Q-Tip test for the assessment of urethral hypermobility and is preferred by subjects.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 528.e1-528.e6

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Volume 206, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 06/2012

Publication status

Published - 06/2012

ISSN

0002-9378

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84861571515
  • PubMed: 22459346

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
13
SciVal
FWCI
0.30
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
70
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
23
Captures
32