Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis from recurrent/progressive brain tumor using nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion

  • Jayant Narang
    ,
  • Rajan Jain(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Tom Mikkelsen
    ,
  • Lisa Scarpace
    ,
  • Mark L. Rosenblum
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Henry Ford Health System
    ,
  • Image Analysis Lab
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis (TIN) from recurrent/progressive tumor (RPT) in brain tumor patients using conventional morphologic imaging features is a very challenging task. Functional imaging techniques also offer moderate success due to the complexity of the tissue microenvironment and the inherent limitation of the various modalities and techniques. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion (DCET1MRP) in differentiating TIN from RPT. Twenty-nine patients with previously treated brain tumors who showed recurrent or progressive enhancing lesion on follow-up MRI underwent DCET1MRP. Another 8 patients with treatment-naïve high-grade gliomas who also underwent DCET1MRP were included as the control group. Semiquantitative indices derived from DCET1MRP included maximum slope of enhancement in initial vascular phase (MSIVP), normalized MSIVP (nMSIVP), normalized slope of delayed equilibrium phase (nSDEP), and initial area under the time-intensity curve (IAUC) at 60 and 120 s (IAUC 60 and IAUC 120) obtained from the enhancement curve. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P < .01), with the RPT group showing higher MSIVP (15.78 vs 8.06), nMSIVP (0.046 vs 0.028), nIAUC60 (33.07 vs 6.44), and nIAUC120 (80.14 vs 65.55) compared with the TIN group. nSDEP was significantly lower in the RPT group (7.20 × 10 -5 vs 15.35 × 10 -5) compared with the TIN group. Analysis of the receiver-operatingcharacteristic curve showed nMSIVP to be the best single predictor of RPT, with very high (95%) sensitivity and high (78%) specificity. Thus, nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from DCET1MRP that are relatively easy to derive and do not require a complex model-based approach may aid in differentiating RPT from TIN and can be used as robust noninvasive imaging biomarkers.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1037-1046 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Neuro-Oncology (Volume 13, Issue 9)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2011

Publication status

Published - 09/2011

ISSN

1522-8517

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80052723447
  • PubMed: 21803763

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
3.12
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
citations
81
SciVal
Paper percentile
95
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
75
Citation count
104

Funding Details

FunderFunding number
NINDS
R21NS058589