Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Direct analyte-probed nanoextraction (DAPNe) coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) for examination of the ink chemistry on documents

  • Vivian Huynh
    ,
  • Mandy S. Phelps
    ,
  • Teresa D. Golden
    ,
  • Guido F. Verbeck(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of North Texas
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) has been coupled to direct analyte-probed nanoextraction (DAPNe) through use of nanomanipulation for the analysis of ink chemistry on documents. DAPNe is first used to extract ink from the document and then deposits the sample on the MALDI plate. Through this method, cutting the document for MALDI-MS analysis is avoided. DAPNe extracts ink from documents with minimal to no visible destruction. Specific dyes and binding agents in the extracted ink are monitored with mass spectrometry. Different matrices, 1, 5-diaminonapthalene (DAN), 2, 5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB), and silver nanoparticles, were tested to compare intensity enhancement of the mass spectra signals. The advantages of using MALDI-MS coupled to DAPNe are shown by characterizing Crystal Violet, Basic Yellow 2, Rhodamine B, and polyethylene glycol from red and blue pens, black pen, and a black inkjet printer cartridge.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 86-92 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Forensic Chemistry (Volume 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/01/2016

Publication status

Published - 11/01/2016

ISSN

2468-1709

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85006137720

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
21
Citation count
12

Funding Details

This project is funded by the National Institute of Justice Grant no. NIJ-2013-3361 .