Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment

  • Zachary Kozick
    ,
  • Ammar Hashmi
    ,
  • James Dove
    ,
  • Marie Hunsinger
    ,
  • Tania Arora
    ,
  • Jeffrey Wild
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Geisinger Medical Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: Oncotype DX (ODX) is a multi-gene tumor assay for breast cancer patients. Our objective is to assess whether eligible ODX patients received the test and whether recommendations were followed based on respective risk. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed testing in patients deemed eligible for ODX using the National Cancer Data Base. Results: A total of 158,235 patients met ODX eligibility criteria. Sixty-four percent of eligible patients did not receive the test. Non-testing rose with age. White patients were more likely to be tested (56%) versus black patients (46%, p < 0.0001). Testing was highest at academic facilities (40%). Privately insured patients were more likely to get the test compared to uninsured (45 versus 34%, p < 0.0001). Those in the highest income quartile were more likely to be tested (p < 0.001). Conclusions: ODX is under-utilized, with racial and socio-economic factors influencing testing. Further studies are necessary to identify ways to remove disparities and increase testing when appropriate.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 686-692 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Surgery (Volume 215, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/2018

Publication status

Published - 04/2018

ISSN

0002-9610

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85020470242
  • PubMed: 28606707

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
22
Mentions
1
Captures
26