Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Dissimilarity measures for histogram-valued observations

  • Jaejik Kim(corresponding author)
    ,
  • L. Billard
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Contemporary datasets can be immense and complex in nature. Thus, summarizing and extracting information frequently precedes any analysis. The summarizing techniques are many and varied and driven by underlying scientific questions of interest. One type of resulting datasets contains so-called histogram-valued observations. While such datasets are becoming more and more pervasive, methodologies to analyse them are still very inadequate. One area of interest falls under the rubric of cluster analysis. Unfortunately, to date, no dis/similarity or distance measures that are readily computable exist for multivariate histogramvalued data. To redress that problem, the present article introduces various dissimilarity measures for histogram data. In particular, extensions to the Gowda-Diday and Ichino-Yaguchi measures for interval data are introduced, along with extensions of some DeCarvalho measures. In addition, a cumulative distribution measure is developed for histograms. These new measures are illustrated for the Fisher iris data and applied to a U.S. temperature dataset.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 283-303 (21 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods (Volume 42, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2013

Publication status

Published - 2013

ISSN

0361-0926

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84872044029

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.21
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
citations
14
SciVal
Paper percentile
73
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
27
Captures
12