Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

DuraSeal Exact Is a Safe Adjunctive Treatment for Durotomy in Spine: Postapproval Study

  • Kee D. Kim(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Dinesh Ramanathan
    ,
  • Jason Highsmith
    ,
  • William Lavelle
    ,
  • Peter Gerszten
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at Davis
    ,
  • Charleston Brain and Spine
    ,
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
    ,
  • University of Pittsburgh
    ,
  • University of South Florida
    ,
  • Washington University St. Louis
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Study Design: A nonrandomized, two-armed prospective study. Objective: Water-tight dural closure is paramount to the prevention of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and associated complications. Synthetic polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel has been used as an adjunct to sutured dural repair; however, its expansion postoperatively is a concern for neurological complications. A low-swell formulation of PEG sealant was introduced as DuraSeal Exact Spine Sealant System (DESS). A Post-Approval Study was performed primarily to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DESS for spinal dural repair compared to current alternatives, in a large patient population, reflecting a real-world practice. Methods: A total of 36 sites in the United States enrolled 429 patients treated with DESS as an adjunct to dural repair in the spinal sealant group and 406 patients treated with all other modalities in the control arm, from October 2011 to June 2016. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CSF leak within 90 days of operation. The secondary endpoints evaluated were deep surgical site infection and neurological serious adverse events. Results: The CSF leakage in the DESS group (6.6%) was not significantly different from the control group (6.5%) (p =.83), and there was no significant difference in the time to first leak. The two groups had no significant differences in deep surgical site infection (1.6% versus control 2.1%, p =.61) or proportion of subjects with neurological serious adverse events (2.9% versus control 1.6%, p =.516). Conclusions: DuraSeal Exact Spinal Sealant is safe when compared to current alternatives for spinal dural repair.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 272-278 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Global Spine Journal (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/01/2019

Publication status

Published - 05/01/2019

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85067199164

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
2.21
SciVal
Author count
7
SciVal
citations
9
SciVal
Paper percentile
87
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.14
Fractional count
6
Fractional count
0.86
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
37
Citation count
23
Usage
332