Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of a collagen matrix on healing in periodontal fenestration defects in dogs.

  • S. Y. Choi(corresponding author)
    ,
  • R. E. Nilvéus
    ,
  • R. D. Minutello
    ,
  • G. J. Zimmerman
    ,
  • U. M. Wikesjö
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Contralateral periodontal fenestration defects in seven beagle dogs were used to evaluate influence of a collagen matrix on periodontal wound healing. The defects (6 x 4 mm) were created through the buccal cortical plates of the maxillary canine teeth following elevation of mucoperiosteal flaps. The collagen was fitted to the defects on one side. Contralateral defects served as controls. Flaps were repositioned and sutured. Dogs were sacrificed 4 weeks after surgery and block sections including teeth and surrounding structures were prepared for histometric analysis. No meaningful differences in cementum and bone regeneration were observed between treatments. There was seemingly more bone regeneration in the apical than in the coronal aspect of the defects and significantly more cementum regeneration. Root resorption was observed in one collagen and one control defect. Ankylosis was not observed. The results suggest that the maxillary canine periodontal fenestration defect can be used as a model to evaluate factors that may enhance cementum and bone regeneration. The collagen matrix neither enhanced nor inhibited periodontal wound healing in this model.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 878-882 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of periodontology (Volume 64, Issue 9)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1993

Publication status

Published - 1993

ISSN

0022-3492

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0027665176
  • PubMed: 8229624

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
26
Citation count
28