Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of drying methods on hybrid layer thickness

  • Kousuke Itou
    ,
  • Yasuhiro Torii
    ,
  • Fumiko Oyama
    ,
  • Masahiro Yoshiyama
    ,
  • David H. Pashley(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of drying methods used in scanning electron microscopy on the thickness of the hybrid layers created by several different adhesive systems. Methods: A total etch dry bonding system, (Photobond), a three-step bonding adhesive system, (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose), a wet-bonding adhesive system (All-Bond 2) and a self-etching primer system (Mac Bond II) were used in this study. To permit measurement of the thickness of the hybrid layer, the resin-dentin interfaces were polished and etched briefly to remove polishing debris followed by immersion in 10% NaOCl for 4 hours. Half of the specimens in each group were subjected to fixation and critical-point drying followed by gold sputter-coating. The remaining specimens were allowed to air dry prior to gold sputter-coating. SEM observations were carried out to determine the structure and thickness of the hybrid layers. Results: The thickness of hybrid layers were affected by the drying methods with the critical-point drying methods producing the thickest hybrid layers (P< 0.05). The thickest hybrid layers were created by Photobond, with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and All-Bond 2 producing intermediate thickness hybrid layers, among the total etch systems. The thinnest hybrid layer among all of the adhesive systems was produced by the self-etching primer, Mac Bond II.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 335-339 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American journal of dentistry (Volume 16, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2003

Publication status

Published - 10/2003

ISSN

0894-8275

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 1542652940
  • PubMed: 14677613

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.78
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
10
SciVal
Paper percentile
58
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Citation count
10
Captures
17