Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials

  • A. L. Neme(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • L. B. Roeder
    ,
  • T. L. Debner
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Detroit Mercy
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Many polishing protocols have been evaluated in vitro for their effect on the surface roughness of restorative materials. These results have been useful in establishing protocols for in vivo application. However, limited research has focused on the subsequent care and maintenance of esthetic restorations following their placement. This investigation evaluated the effect of five polishing protocols that could be implemented at recall on the surface roughness of five direct esthetic restorative materials. Specimens (n=25) measuring 8 mm diameter X 3 mm thick were fabricated in an acrylic mold using five light-cured resin-based materials (hybrid composite, microfilled composite, packable composite, compomer and resin-modified glass ionomer). After photopolymerization, all specimens were polished with Sof-Lex Disks to produce an initial (baseline) surface finish. All specimens were then polished with one of five prophylactic protocols (Butler medium paste, Butler coarse paste, OneGloss, SuperBuff or OneGloss & SuperBuff). The average surface roughness of each treated specimen was determined from three measurements with a profilometer (Surface 1). Next, all specimens were brushed 60,000 times at 1.5 Hz using a brush-head force of 2 N on a Manly V-8 cross-brushing machine in a 50:50 (w/w) slurry of toothpaste and water. The surface roughness of each specimen was measured after brushing (Surface 2) followed by re-polishing with one of five protocols, then final surface roughness values were determined (Surface 3). The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Significant differences (p=0.05) in surface roughness were observed among restorative materials and polishing protocols. The microfilled and hybrid resin composite yielded significantly rougher surfaces than the other three materials following tooth brushing. Prophylactic polishing protocols can be used to restore a smooth surface on resin-based esthetic restorative materials following simulated tooth brushing.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 50-58 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Operative dentistry (Volume 27, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/2002

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2002

ISSN

0361-7734

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0036365313
  • PubMed: 11817469

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
48
SciVal
FWCI
2.72
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
Paper percentile
85
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX

Captures
44
Social media
6
Citation count
64